Thursday, June 30, 2011

tom cruise and katie holmes wedding

images Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes tom cruise and katie holmes wedding. Tom Cruise amp; Katie Holmes
  • Tom Cruise amp; Katie Holmes



  • pkv
    07-11 11:05 AM
    I don't know what do you mean by success. as far as media coverage is concerned, Fireign media (India, China or elsewhere) doesn't help. It's local media, which can create some usefull awareness. How does awareness in a different country helps?? I don't know why even people talking coverage about foreig media?????

    Sometime back.. I also read some comment talking about involving Indian govt. in this.... Bullshit.. What does a different country's govt has to do with it!!!

    Point is.. don't get too excited for having done nothing... Do something substantial and keep doing.





    wallpaper Tom Cruise amp; Katie Holmes tom cruise and katie holmes wedding. Tom+Cruise in Tom Cruise and
  • Tom+Cruise in Tom Cruise and



  • vls
    06-22 10:14 AM
    I have direct responses from Murthy and Rajiv Khanna now . Plus 2 other american lawyers I know. The answers have variations. I'm going to do my own research and would encourage others to do the same before coming to a conclusion on this.

    If you have asked this question to your own lawyers about multiple I485 filing, please post them here.

    Members can then look at all the information and make their own decisions.

    I work for MSFT - I am a dependent on my husband's process (he works for another company), and I also have my own process filed, where he is my dependent.

    When I asked if we could have 2 processes, the lawyer answered:

    "There is no problem with you pursuing I-485 applications through the two companies since you and you husband have reverse roles in each process as principal beneficiary and dependent".

    Hope this helps other people on the same situation.





    tom cruise and katie holmes wedding. Katie Holmes Tom Cruise,
  • Katie Holmes Tom Cruise,



  • GCapplicant
    06-29 04:16 PM
    Damn this green card-If its true-What are they thinking screwing our lives-torture-saddistic I hate this man-thats the limit-all these years we wait-they have no word of honour-selfish cruel people.

    Back home we spend so much for our govt for our own education -here no respect for us-I feel really hurted this time-Staying at home in H4 is a torture-





    2011 Tom+Cruise in Tom Cruise and tom cruise and katie holmes wedding. Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes Wedding
  • Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes Wedding



  • pappu
    10-18 10:32 AM
    More info
    http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/privacy/privacy_pia_uscis_bcs.pdf



    more...


    tom cruise and katie holmes wedding. images Tom cruise and katie
  • images Tom cruise and katie



  • gvenkat
    09-23 08:01 PM
    we have a total of 48,000 eb-2 and 68,000 EB-3 i would think this number includes the Spouses,children etc. so all it needs is 120,000 visa numbers am i right? SO based on that what are the hopes for EB3-I in the next year or so





    tom cruise and katie holmes wedding. #11 Tom Cruise and Katie
  • #11 Tom Cruise and Katie



  • easygoer
    08-26 07:43 AM
    I recently purchased Vonage. Had to call vonage customer service for installation. They gave very good service and I could connect all my phone and then called India too! Voice was excellent ( I have verizon DSL line).



    more...


    tom cruise and katie holmes wedding. of Tom and Katie#39;s wedding
  • of Tom and Katie#39;s wedding



  • deardar
    01-25 10:54 AM
    stole this from an other DB:

    If you are travelling on AP and dont want the hassle of transit visas, the following airports are AP "friendly" ....
    1) Frankfurt (Air-India or Lufthansa).
    2) Amsterdam (KLM, Northwest, United)
    3) Dubai/Sharjah/Kuwait (Emirates, Kuwait Air)
    4) All Pacific stopovers - Tokyo, Seoul, Kuala Lumpur, Singapore (China Air, JAL, Korean Air, Malaysian Airlines, Singapore Airlines)

    Thumbrule : Via the Atlantic route (Europe stopover) you must avoid London, Paris, Geneva (other Swiss airports are fine). Via the Pacific route, you are fine with any airport/airline.

    In my case, I used Air-India from Chicago to Mumbai via Frankfurt (twice in 2005). No transit visa issues and great food - hot samosas soon after takeoff from Chicago !

    Hope this helps .....





    2010 Katie Holmes Tom Cruise, tom cruise and katie holmes wedding. Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes
  • Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes



  • bitzbytz
    03-29 05:18 PM
    Thanks to IV for getting this done



    more...


    tom cruise and katie holmes wedding. katie homes tom cruise 22108
  • katie homes tom cruise 22108



  • veerufs
    10-13 07:59 PM
    My checks got cleared on Oct 10th. Mine is delivered to NSC and recieved by
    J BARRET July 2nd 10:28AM. Reciepts from Texas.





    hair Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes Wedding tom cruise and katie holmes wedding. Weight: - tom cruise height in
  • Weight: - tom cruise height in



  • optimystic
    08-21 08:30 PM
    I think the division of Eb2 and EB3 will be over when oct VB comes. Mostly Eb3 will go back 2003 or 2004 and Eb3 date may be 2002. At that time there will be unity.

    The current visa bulletin says EB3 PDs may go back to the level that was in June 08 visa bulletin or worser. So it is very likely that EB3 will be anywhere between Apr 2001 to Nov 2001. Personally I would be happy if it remained at least beyond May 2001.

    I dont see EB3 moving to 2002 unless USCIS wants to agressively move it forward, so that they can continue their unfair trend of procesing some out of order low hanging fruit cases in EB3 category, just because they are sitting on the top of their applications pile, even if they had much later PDs. Just like they are doing with EB2


    What will unite people is to fight against the common pain point... *Unfair advantage given to out of order applicants* , whether it be EB2 or EB3, who are much later in the queue, but some how are on the top of application piles, and easily accessible to IOs- who are making DOS move the PDs, just so that they can clear of their tables by approving these cases, rather than trying to access applications in FIFO and follow a fair process.

    The whole EB2-EB3 divide arose out of this unfair practice of USCIS. Which just on their whim move PDs forward , be it EB3 or EB2. It just happened, that EB2 date has been moved more aggressively, probably because there is less backlog there. But looking at all the EB2 people still waiting with 2003, 2004 PDs while 2006 are getting approvals, indicates that the real problem is USCIS not doing due diligence to identify the right cases to be processed next and get the exact count of such cases.


    Just asking them to recapture visa numbers or cyring foul against wasted numbers etc will still not solve the problem unless we also FORCE them to follow FIFO and process cases FAIRLY. And do their due diligence to spend some time and put their application piles in proper order. Otherwise USCIS will continue to use these recaptured visas and use them to approve FU***&G Out of Order cases and manipulate & play the system to achieve that by jumping around the PD up/down/'U' and what not, just so because it is *convenient* for them to do so.



    more...


    tom cruise and katie holmes wedding. Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes
  • Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes



  • snathan
    03-30 05:43 PM
    If USCIS is providing spillover visas to EB2 in May, shouldn't the PDs of China and India (countries with most demand) have the same PDs in May VB? Doesn't this also mean that in the worst case the PD of EB2 India will be Jul 22 2006 (the current PD of China) in May VB?

    -CinBoy

    First they will move India to July 22 2006, if there are more visa numbers both I/C will move togather.





    hot images Tom cruise and katie tom cruise and katie holmes wedding. Katies Holmes and daughter
  • Katies Holmes and daughter



  • willwin
    08-07 02:48 PM
    Calling all EB3-I with PD before Nov 2005. Please get 3 desi firm names from Sunny_Surya and start EB2 filing. Then port your PD's.
    GCCovet

    I am 03/2005. I am game for this. LOL.



    more...


    house Actor/Scientologist Tom Cruise tom cruise and katie holmes wedding. Katie Holmes spending time
  • Katie Holmes spending time



  • pansworld
    07-15 05:06 PM
    let's compile a list of famous immigrants like Albert Einstien, Henry Kissinger, Madalene Albright et al and change the face of what constitutes a legal immigrant. We need stories of doctors, scientists, engineers (the success of NASA) who were immigrants and benefited this country. That way we can fight the image of the immigrant as a low wage seeking will work for food kind of a worker being created by anti immigrants. Let Lou Dobbs fight history and deny it.





    tattoo #11 Tom Cruise and Katie tom cruise and katie holmes wedding. No one has this unique footage of Tom and Katie#39;s Wedding.
  • No one has this unique footage of Tom and Katie#39;s Wedding.



  • puddonhead
    06-18 11:40 AM
    One more thing....

    <Puddonhead puts his lecturing hat on to boast about his "knowledge">

    Some of you guys have admirable abilities of using rhetoric (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetoric_(Aristotle)). However, in this particular discussion - I guess it will help us all if we could keep the hectoring and general negative rhetoric out of it. Calling someone anti-immigrant in a derogatory fashion because he is opposed to our views - is negative rhetoric. So is the comparison of L1 abuse with house burglary.

    The lawyers are taught the "Socratic Method" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_method) - to chafe out logic from the thicket of rhetoric. This is specially important when we are discussing something from different positions.

    Hope we can get over it and find some common ground.

    </Puddonhead takes off his lecturing hat>



    more...


    pictures of Tom and Katie#39;s wedding tom cruise and katie holmes wedding. tom cruise and katie holmes
  • tom cruise and katie holmes



  • nkalpana
    01-31 10:02 PM
    Hey Prashanth,

    Good luck to you! So yours was a 1 month delay... Hope my husband doesnt have to wait so long as you have.

    Lets all hang on!

    Regards,
    NK





    dresses Katies Holmes and daughter tom cruise and katie holmes wedding. Tom cruise and katie holmes
  • Tom cruise and katie holmes



  • alias
    08-07 11:52 AM
    No, I have the conviction, but don't have money...


    HAHAHAHAHAH......WHAT A JOKER!



    more...


    makeup katie homes tom cruise 22108 tom cruise and katie holmes wedding. Actor/Scientologist Tom Cruise
  • Actor/Scientologist Tom Cruise



  • CADude
    11-06 03:40 PM
    Wow.. Applicants are waiting since 2002 and Govt Agency know it but don't do anything. Shame on you FBI NNCP :mad:

    Check this:
    http://www.bibdaily.com/pdfs/Liang%2010-30-07.pdf

    Defendants assert that the background check is a complex
    process that must accommodate an extremely large volume of requests
    from the USCIS. Given the backlog of name-check requests and the
    FBI�s limited resources, they maintain that the delay of two and a
    half years in processing Mr. Liang�s background check is not
    unreasonable. There is some validity to these points, and the
    Court appreciates that the name-check process is indeed complex and
    resource-intensive. But limited resources or not, a common-sense
    rule of reason dictates that if the FBI was performing background
    checks with due diligence, it would not take two and a half years
    to process Mr. Liang�s name. While the Court is sympathetic to the
    demands placed on the FBI and the limited ability of the USCIS to
    control how the FBI allocates its resources, a lack of sufficient
    resources devoted to name-check operations is a matter for the
    agencies to take up between themselves or with Congress. The
    executive branch must decide for itself how best to meet its
    statutory duties; this Court can only decide whether or not those
    duties have been met.
    See Dong, 2007 WL 2601107 at *11 (�[I]t is
    not the place of the judicial branch to weigh a plaintiff�s clear
    right to administrative action against the agency�s burdens in
    complying.�).
    Moreover, although there is no Congressionally mandated
    timetable for the processing of I-485 applications, Congress has by
    statute expressed its view of what a reasonable amount of time is:
    �It is the sense of Congress that the processing of an immigration benefit application should be completed not later than 180 days
    after the initial filing of the application.� 8 U.S.C. � 1571.
    The Court recognizes that this statute was enacted prior to the
    events of September 11, 2001, and that the burdens on agencies with
    responsibility for immigration matters have since increased.
    Nonetheless, Plaintiffs� applications have been pending for five
    times the length of the period identified by Congress.
    Defendants argue that expediting Mr. Liang�s name check will
    prejudice other applicants who have been waiting longer than he -in some cases, since as long as December, 2002.
    While this would
    be unfortunate, Defendants� failure to fulfill their statutory duty
    to other applicants has no bearing on whether they have fulfilled
    their statutory duty to Plaintiffs, and thus cannot serve as a
    basis for denying Plaintiffs� motion.
    While Defendants worry that
    granting Plaintiffs relief may reward �the more litigious
    applicants� or encourage other applicants to file lawsuits,
    �perhaps recognizing this possibility will provide the defendants
    with adequate incentive to begin processing [I-485] applications in
    a lawful and timely fashion in order to obviate the applicants�
    need to resort to the courts for redress.� Dong, 2007 WL 2601107
    at *12.





    girlfriend No one has this unique footage of Tom and Katie#39;s Wedding. tom cruise and katie holmes wedding. katie holmes wedding cake. Tom
  • katie holmes wedding cake. Tom



  • CADude
    09-24 09:30 PM
    Dear Mr. XXX,

    Pursuant to our conversation today, I am forwarding the reply from the Nebraska Service Center of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) regarding our inquiry into your application for Adjustment of Status (I-485).

    Our office initiated an inquiry into your case as a result of your correspondence dated September 12, 2007 sent to Congresswoman Maxine Waters. If you receive or do not receive a notice of action from CIS within the next 30 days please notify our Immigration Caseworker, Blanca Jimenez at ext. 18.

    Thank you for contacting the office of Congresswoman Maxine Waters to assist you in this matter.



    Sincerely,


    Blanca Jimenez
    Constituent Services Supervisor
    Office of Congresswoman Maxine Waters (CA-35)
    323.757.8900 ext. 18
    323.757.9506 fax


    Good Morning Ms. Jimenez,

    I do not show that we have data-entered Mr. XXX�s I-485 yet. The I-485 must be in line to be data-entered because we receipted an I-765 (LIN-07-245-XXXX).

    The I485 application is still pending at this office. Although the Department of State Visa Bulletin indicated visas were available for most employment categories USCIS still has to adjudicate every application. NSC has approximately 26,000 I485 applications that may have a visa available and we are reviewing them as expeditiously as possible. This application is in line to be worked but it will take time. Please allow an additional 45 days for NSC to adjudicate the application. If you have not received a notice from NSC after 45 days you may submit another inquiry.

    Thank you,

    Congressional Liaison
    U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service
    Nebraska Service Center



    Respected Ms Waters,

    Sub: USCIS inefficiency for Legal Immigration


    I send my I-485 AOS application to USCIS and received on July 2nd 2007 at Nebraska Service Center, Lincoln, NE.

    It's almost approx 75 days since the application received at USCIS and have not received the Receipt Notice or any notification from USCIS.

    I tried to contact Customer Service at USCIS. They don't provided any information. USCIS website updates show they are processing 08/01 or later for AOS application. They are not following the First In First Out(FIFO) order.

    I need help of your good to know the status of my I-485 application.

    Thank you,





    hairstyles Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes tom cruise and katie holmes wedding. Tom Cruise amp; Katie Holmes
  • Tom Cruise amp; Katie Holmes



  • OLDMONK
    07-09 07:18 PM
    Here is a Screen Shot of USCIS statement for Flower Campaign. For Archival Purposes.

    or for people who missed or non believers.





    inderman
    10-22 07:21 PM
    Got my CPO email few minutes back... Thank you all for your support and ALL THE BEST!!!
    HOPE FULLY, ALL OF YOU GET IT ASAP...

    NO LUD after Feb 2009 when i did my second finger printing.

    Created SR thru NCSC, did not help.

    Went to Infopass, no help from ppl i spoke with there.

    Did congress man enquiry, not sure if this helped. (as of yday, they had not received a response from uscis and were still waiting for a reply)

    Sent letter to Ombudsman, they told me they were checking with USCIS...

    No Idea which one worked... Good Luck to all of you...

    PD JAN 15, 2005
    case was transferred to NSC from TSC
    NO LUD after Feb 2009
    Had applied AC 21 on Aug 2008





    ksrk
    09-12 06:41 PM
    ------------------------------------------------------
    Update
    ------------------------------------------------------

    We have learned that in all probability House Judiciary committee will finishing marking up HR5882 in the next committee meeting. The bill is likely to be brought to the House floor the following week. We have been told that if our bill(s) pass the House, Senate will include the language of the bill(s) in another Senate bill that has majority support. We must admit that the time is shot but its still possible.

    We request everyone that starting monday, please call all the members of Judiciary committee. Thanks to the members who have already made phone calls to the lawmaker's office. We request you to please call again to show your support starting Monday.

    Thanks,

    Thanks a lot for the update - this sure is encouraging!

    Two quick questions...
    1. When is the "next committee meeting" - next week or later?
    2. Any changes to the list of members of the Judiciary committee? Better still, it will be great if you could re-post the latest list so we can get going with the fresh wave of phone calls...

    Thanks again and let's pull up our socks for the home stretch.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment